Issue
|
Finding
|
Result
|
|
The contract called for craft labor to
be billed at actual cost plus the actual costs of payroll taxes,
insurance, fringe benefits, and percentage markups for tools. |
The auditor conducted thorough reviews
of the contractor's payroll registers, personnel records, tax
remittances, insurance premiums, and fringe benefit costs.
|
The labor rates were found to be
overstated. The contractor refunded the overcharge for the
project and for other projects with that contractor and the
owner.
$125,500 Recovery
$1.1 Million Savings
Total
Source: AMG Archives |
|
Labor burden included the cost of
worker compensation insurance. |
The auditor discovered that correct
classification of craft labor would lower premiums and that
there were discounts not being provided by the contractor. |
The contractor agreed that the
classifications were in error and refunded the discount amounts.
$818,850 Savings
Source: AMG Archives |
|
A cost-plus contractor requested
increases for small tools, testing, and insurance. |
The internal auditor found that the
contractor was self insured and that insurance cost data did not
support the increase. |
The rate increase was denied, saving
the owner $115,000.
$115,000 Savings
Source:
Internal Auditor, 6/93, p.70
(contributed by Baton Rouge Chapter of IIA) |
|
Contractor reimbursements were based
upon estimated payroll tax rates. Actual tax rates, to be used
according to the contract, were lower. |
The internal auditor found that the
tax rates declined in the second year of the contract, yet the
contractor had not passed the reduction through in its billings. |
The construction company refunded the
amount of the taxes overcharged.
$ Unknown Savings
Source:
Internal Auditor, 4/98, p.95
(contributed by Central Iowa Chapter of IIA) |
|
A subcontract contained provisions for
training at cost of the course plus 15%. The subcontractor
billed employee training time on site at regular hourly rates. |
No hourly charges were billable per
the contract. The auditor scheduled $125,000 in over-billings |
Management negotiated a refund with
the contractor.
Source: Internal Auditor,
8/98, p. 84 (contributed by Downeast Maine Chapter of IIA) |
|
Project subcontractors were required
to work a considerable amount of overtime on both scope work and
change order work. |
The auditor consultant evaluated the
rates charged and reimbursed and found them to exceed
subcontract terms and conditions. |
The auditor's analysis indicated
overpayments of more than $60,000.
$60,000 at issue
Source: CRW Archives |
|
Engineers were billed at actual pay
rates plus a contract multiplier. |
The auditor compared billed rates to
those indicated by the payroll register and personnel files,
finding excessive rates billed in the amount of 7%. |
The engineering firm agreed to refund
the overcharges and correct its billing system.
$115,000 Savings
Source: AMG Archives |
|
Per diem charges were billed by the
electrical contractor. |
The auditor discovered documentation
that the labor billing rates already contained an allowance for
per diem expenses. |
The contractor refunded the
overcharge.
$25,085 Recovery
Source: AMG Archives |