|
Here are some examples of savings
arising from capital project Auditing Activities. The examples
include those encountered by internal auditors, CRW president Al
Gray during his tenure as a corporate auditor, and CRW/ConstructionAudits.com.
|
Recoveries |
|
Savings |
Defined as immediate
monetary resolutions of audit issues by means of a cash
refund, discount, credit memo, offset against a concurrent
calim from the other party, or receipt of materials or
services as compensation.
Appear in
Green in the examples
table
|
|
Defined as immediate
monetary resolutuions of issues plus quantifiable, monetary
savings arising from satisfactory resolution of the issue.
Long term savings are generally reduced to net present value.
Appear in
Blue in the examples
table
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
Savings |
|
Losses |
Issues for which savings
likely occurred, or will occur, for which the ultimate
resolution is undetermined or unsettled.
Appear in
Black in
the examples table
|
|
Issues for which avoidable
losses were incurred.
Appear in
Red in the examples
table
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
Large fabricated equipment was shipped
by a fabricator to the owner's sites. The fabricator's shop
foreman arranged the shipments, with the freight charges added
to the owner's invoice. The owner did not verify that the
freight charges were reasonable. |
Noticing that the freight charges were
averaging $25,000 per shipment, the auditor sought alternative
freight rates and made a recommendation that the owner arrange
for the pickup, loading and shipment of the equipment. |
The freight charges dropped from
$25,000 per shipment to less than $10,000 per shipment. Based
upon the owner's requirements for the equipment, more than
$60,000 per year in savings was achieved.
$60,000 Savings
Source:
CRW Archives |
.
|
 |
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION SAVINGS |
 |
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
A company engaged a systems
implementation contractor at a fixed price of $1MM, then
approved enhancements at T&M rates. |
The internal auditor noted, during a
review of the contractor’s time charges, that some work billed
as enhancements were within the original, fixed price scope of
work. |
The company attorney pursued recovery
of $110,000 in duplicated services.
$110,000 Recovery
Source: IInternal Auditor,
12/93, p.73 (contributed by San Francisco Chapter of IIA) |
|
A software vendor had bid $4.6 million
for software and $3.2 for maintenance for the company’s
1000-user system. |
The internal auditor researched the
vendor’s marketing materials and found that the vendor offered
50% discounts to smaller users and discounted maintenance to 15%
of the purchase price. These discounts were larger than those
offered to the company.
|
The company renegotiated the contract,
producing a $1.7 MM savings.
$1.7 Million Savings
Source: IInternal Auditor,
4/98, p.98 (contributed by East Tennessee Chapter of IIA) |
|
A systems integration contractor was
allowed to purchase third party software on a "Time and
Materials" basis. However, any supporting invoices for such
services bore no pricing. |
Upon questioning from the auditor the
contractor asserted that the purchases were part of the fixed
price portion of the contract. The auditor obtained the invoice
copies from the third party supplier and discovered that an
unauthorized 17% markup had been applied.
|
The contractor attributed the $200,000
overcharge to a billing error.
$200,000
Recovery
Source: IInternal Auditor,
8/98, p. 84 (contributed by Anonymous Contributor) |
.
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
The general contractors cost-plus
billings to the owner were manually prepared. |
Testing by the auditor indicated the
absence of controls over duplicate invoicing for subcontract
payments, paid vendor invoices, and other billed costs. |
Thorough review by the auditor proved
multiple instances of duplicate invoicing that the contractor
agreed to reimburse.
$175,060 Recovery
Source: AMG archives |
|
Unknown to the contractor, one of its
employees was generating fictitious invoices for materials and
was collecting from the owner. |
Owner engineering and internal
auditing collaborated to uncover the fraud. |
The fraud was determined to involve
about $12,000.
$12,000 Loss
Source: IInternal Auditor,
2/94, p.70 (contributed by Illiana Chapter of IIA) |
|
The project accounting department
overpaid accrued sales taxes to the state. |
The auditor discovered that credit
entries were not posted to tax accrual schedules. |
The contractor acknowledged the error
and refunded the excess charges.
$7,050 Recovery
Source: AMG archives |
|
A subcontractor billing was
incorrectly totaled. |
The auditor detected the error while
testing invoice extensions and footing. |
The subcontractor agreed to a billing
credit to eliminate the overcharge.
$10,000
Recovery
Source: AMG archives |
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
A plant waste removal contractor was
using the rated capacity of refuse bins to calculate billings
rather than the actual volume hauled away. |
The internal auditor found that actual
volumes were ¼ of the amount billed and that billing rates were
also in error. |
The company recovered $227,500 in
overcharges and presumably saved the cost of future overcharges.
$227,500 Recoveries
Source: Internal Auditor,
2/94, p.71 (contributed by Illiana Chapter of IIA) |
|
Technician service agreements allowed
supervisors periodic trips home, with the owner reimbursing the
costs. |
The internal auditor checked plant
sign-in sheets and found that 9 supervisors worked during times
in which trips home were billed and that airline tickets were
redeemed for cash. |
Reimbursements to the owner totaled
$18,000.
$18,000 Recovery
Source: Internal Auditor,
12/95, p.69 (contributed by Central Virginia Chapter of IIA) |
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
A portion of a fabrication contract
was paid for, but was not delivered. |
The auditor discovered the non
delivery in a review of invoices. |
The delivery was secured.
$12,760 Recovery
Source: AMG archives |
|
Issue |
Finding |
Result |
|
The company had secured more than $50
million of Industrial Revenue Bond financing at a substantial
rate savings for designated systems. Due to a number of factors
the company was faced with the need to relinquish unused
financing. |
The auditor evaluated the requirements
of the financing by reviewing the Code of Federal Regulations,
consulting with Treasury and Law departments, and considering
other portions of the project that might qualify. Qualifying
systems were found in a number of areas, principally the coal
fired boiler. |
An amended project application was
submitted allowing the company to retain the otherwise unused
funds.
$2.1 Million
Savings
(at NPV)
> $5 Million
Total Savings
Source: AMG archives |
|
|